Source:National Post– a look at the Canadian Federal Senate.
“While Prime Minister Stephen Harper was conducting a Latin American tour last week, a firestorm was in full force concerning questionable expenses of prominent Conservative senators Mike Duffy and Pamela Wallin. Before Harper actually left for Latin America, his respected chief of staff, Nigel Wright, had already resigned from his post after making the decision to give Senator Duffy $90,000 to pay a portion of his debt to the Canadian public.
Meanwhile, the official opposition New Democratic Party (NDP) called for the outright abolition of the Senate—an appointed upper chamber of the Canadian Parliament. This has been the traditional position of the NDP for years. Prime Minister Harper has long been a strong proponent of major senate reform both during his opposition years and now. His approach revolves around the concept of a “Triple E Senate”—elected, equal and effective. The third Canadian parliamentary party, the Liberal party, having benefited for many years from dominating the Senate, has been far more ambiguous about its vision. Currently, legal issues regarding senate reform have been referred to the Canadian Supreme Court for a ruling.”
From the Americas Quarterly
This might sound strange as an American commenting on Canadian affairs, but Canadians do that all the time when it comes to American news, like our healthcare system or foreign policy (to use as examples) or why our taxes are so low, perhaps they are jealous, who knows. So I feel free to comment about Canada and not just because of my First Amendment right as an American.
As an American whose familiar with both Canadian and British news because we get a lot of each others news just because of the nature of the relationships and histories of these three countries and someone who loves politics generally and not just American politics, I can’t help but want to weigh in on the issue of what Canada should do with its Federal Senate. Especially since they can’t seem to stay out our business when it comes to how we elect our President or the fact that we have a President, or a real bicameral Congress that includes a real Senate.
But if you go over to Europe (not including Britain) you’ll see other countries there that have real Senate’s and where the Senate is the real upper chamber in Parliament like in France or Italy or Germany. (To use as examples) So it’s not as if Canada would be copying America nor should they copy anyone by having a bicameral Parliament that’s a real bicameral Parliament and not just that on paper.
I’m not talking about weakening the Canadian House of Commons which is supposed to be the lower chamber of Parliament in Canada anyway. Or taking the power to elect the Prime Minster out of the House of Commons. I’m simply talking about reforming the Senate in Canada and making it a real Senate with real authority and the real upper chamber in Parliament.
The only ways I would make the Canadian Parliament like the U.S Congress with our House of Representatives and Senate, is simply change how laws are passed in Parliament where both chambers would have to agree to the same law, before Parliament could pass one. Which is how it’s done in Congress and where both chambers would have the authority and responsibility to conduct oversight over the executive in Canada or what we call the administration or executive branch.
And give the Senate the right to consent or not consent over executive appointments from the Prime Minister to establish real checks and balances in Canada between the executive and Parliament.
And I would give the House of Commons first crack at all legislation introduced by the Prime minister, but whatever legislation that they pass then the Senate would get a crack at it do with it as they please. And if the pass a bill then the two chambers could come together to write the final bill that’s passed out of Parliament.
The last change I would make to the Senate in Canada is to democratize it, similar to how Americans elect their Senators where each state gets the same amount of senators and they are elected and get to run for reelection and have to win reelection to stay in office as a senator. Canadians would get to do the same thing with each province getting the same amount of senators who would have and you would have to be a resident of that province to run for Senate for that province. And then get elected to serve in the Federal Senate in Ottawa and have to get reelected to keep your seat and continue to serve in the upper chamber of Parliament in the Federal Government.
I’m not talking about weakening the House of Commons in Canada but having it serve as the lower chamber of Parliament which it’s supposed to be anyway and if anything would now have more power with first crack at all legislation introduced by the Prime Minister, but I would empower the Senate and democratize it.
The debate in Canada right now about its Senate seems to be about whether to keep it or not. And if you keep it how to reform it because no one seems to like the current setup of the Senate there. But that’s not a real debate since it would take a constitutional amendment to the Canadian constitution to abolish the Senate. Same thing in America which will probably never happen here either so then the real question is how to reform the Senate in Canada. And since Canada is a democracy, it seems to me the best way would be to democratize it and give it real power.
Read Full Post »