Source:Fed Vid– Canadian Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau, in 1978.
“Toward the end of overcoming the increasingly interminable intransigence of provincial governments toward constitutional reform, the Prime Minister announces a plan to carry out the matter unilaterally. (June 1978)”
From Fed Vid
I guess since for the last sixty years or longer Canada has been looking for its own identity that distinguishes it from America and Britain. That represents both Britain and France ethnically in the country as well as other European people’s and people from parts of the world.
One reason for that is that share a three thousand mile border with the most powerful country in the world in the United States and that’s exactly what I believe Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau was doing back in 1978 by, giving Canada a real Federal constitution that they can call their own that makes them different from America and Britain. That looks Canadian and represents Canada and what the Federal Government’s relationship with the Canadian provinces is.
A constitution that lays out how much power both the Federals and provinces have and how much freedom the Canadian people have and so-forth. And a big part of that had to do with the. Federal Senate that it isn’t very Democratic and doesn’t have much authority even though it’s suppose to be the upper chamber in the Federal Parliament in Canada.
What makes Canada different from America and Europe is that they are politically different than both countries. They share more of the social democratic values and policies that are common in Europe, but also believe in federalism.
Canada has a healthy skepticism for centralize power and I’m not Canadian but I believe that’s what they should build off of in creating their own Federal constitution in a country that’s a real social democracy, but not big fans of centralize power. A country that has a real bicameral Parliament and make the Senate there a real upper-chamber in Parliament that’s democratic and has real power.
An upper-chamber in a legislature should have where Senators are elected by the people, meaning all of them and represent the provinces. But where the House of Commons represents the people similar to America, but a big difference being that the House of Commons would still elect the executive.
I believe a federalist social democracy could work in Canada where they are a social democracy. But where the provinces have a lot of authority if not most of it with the Federal Government serves as regulator of these public-programs instead of Ottawa trying to manage everything and run the entire country.
A federalist, but still social democratic system could work in Canada and perhaps a name for the country besides Canada that gives the country its own identity. Perhaps the United Federation of Canada to use as an example that makes Canada unique in a positive sense from its allies and competitors.
Read Full Post »